Political status and decolonisation

History of American Samoa political status

The Fitisemanu v. United States litigation from 2018 to its 2022 conclusion.

Reading time
1 min read
Published
Status verified as of

Suggest a correction

The Fitisemanu litigation

Petitioners sought birthright citizenship; American Samoa's government opposed it to protect its land-tenure and matai system.[1]

The Tenth Circuit ruled against birthright citizenship on 27 December 2021, and the Supreme Court denied certiorari in October 2022.[2]

Sources for this page

Each number marks a specific claim. Notes give the source, its locator and how it relates to the claim.

  1. 1.

    Claim: In the Fitisemanu litigation, three American Samoan petitioners sought a court ruling granting automatic birthright US citizenship under the Fourteenth Amendment, initially granted by a federal district court in Utah; American Samoa's own territorial government opposed this claim, citing fear that automatic citizenship could jeopardize the territory's traditional land-tenure system and matai (chiefly) political structure, and stating that American Samoans had not reached a consensus in favour of citizenship.

    • Fitisemanu v. United States and American Samoan Citizenship (LegalClarity) link, Territorial government opposition section. Source record
  2. 2.

    Claim: The Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled on 27 December 2021 that people born in American Samoa are not entitled to birthright citizenship under the Fourteenth Amendment; the US Supreme Court denied certiorari on 17 October 2022, leaving American Samoans' status as US nationals (rather than citizens) unchanged.

    • Fitisemanu v. United States (Wikipedia) link, Tenth Circuit ruling and certiorari denial section. Source record

Source note

Show in the notes list